Canada’s Christian Heritage Party and its leader, Ron Gray, are being taken to the Canadian Human Rights Commission over commentary and opinion related to how the government and society should treat homosexuality.  And Gray says he’s been told directly by an employee of the Human Rights Commission that the Canadian Human Rights Act is “about censorship.”

An Edmonton man, Rob Wells, has filed three complaints against Gray and his party.  Two of them relate to the reposting of an item first published on WorldNetDaily.com back in April of 2002; an article written by Jon Dougherty entitled, “Report: pedophilia more common among gays: Research purports to reveal ‘dark side’ of homosexual culture.” 

The third complaint is against Ron Gray personally for several commentaries he wrote and distributed to party members.  One of those commentaries, entitled “Sitcom prophet,” likened the current climate of debate about homosexuality in Canada to the “Cone of Silence” in the 1960s-era television situation comedy Get Smart, where the two leading characters would isolate themselves in a room where no-one could hear them, but they couldn’t hear one another either.  Gray wrote in the commentary that:  “The problem with Canada’s ‘Cone of Silence’ over the issue of homosexuality is that, like the security device in Get Smart, the inevitable result is that no one can communicate anything – and even the truth gets silenced.”

In an exclusive interview with www.noapologies.ca, Ron Gray says the complaints filed against him and his party allege they are “motivated by hate, and defaming homosexual persons.”

Human Rights Act about “censorship”

And, he says, when he had a conversation with a Commission employee, mediator Bob Fagan, about the specifics of the allegation, he was astonished at what he heard.  “I told him that it seemed to be an abuse of the Human Rights Act for someone to try and use it as an instrument of censorship.  And when I said that, on the phone, there was a pause and then he said, in a somewhat astonished tone:  ‘But the Human Rights Act is about censorship.’  Then it was my turn to be silent on my end, because I found that breath-taking.  For the Human Rights Commission’s own mediator to acknowledge that censorship was the purpose of their Act.”

And Gray says as far as the “hate motivation” is concerned, nothing could be further from the truth.  “I would contend,” he says, “that Christians are the best friends homosexuals have because we want to see them delivered from an addiction that will shorten their lives.”  Gray also say he’d be much happier fighting this battle in a regular court rather than before the Canadian Human Rights Commission, where the usual rules of evidence don’t apply.  “If (Mr. Wells) truly believes I am motivated by hate, his complaint should not be before the Human Rights Commission.  He should charge me under Section 319 of the Criminal Code (of Canada).  That carries with it the possibility of two years in jail, but in defence of the (free speech) rights of Canadians I am perfectly willing to risk going to jail.”

Originally published in Christian Courier, December 3, 2007.

Used with permission.  Copyright © 2007 Christianity.ca.